Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 105
Filter
2.
Eur J Cancer ; 147: 154-160, 2021 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33676266

ABSTRACT

The worldwide spread of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and the associated infectious coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has posed a unique challenge to medical staff, patients and their families. Patients with cancer, particularly those with haematologic malignancies, have been identified to be at high risk to develop severe COVID-19. Since publication of our previous guideline on evidence-based management of COVID-19 in patients with cancer, research efforts have continued and new relevant data has come to light, maybe most importantly in the field of vaccination studies. Therefore, an update of our guideline on several clinically important topics is warranted. Here, we provide a concise update of evidence-based recommendations for rapid diagnostics, viral shedding, vaccination and therapy of COVID-19 in patients with cancer. This guideline update was prepared by the Infectious Diseases Working Party (AGIHO) of the German Society for Haematology and Medical Oncology by critically reviewing the currently available data on these topics applying evidence-based medicine criteria.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Testing/standards , COVID-19 Vaccines/therapeutic use , COVID-19 , Neoplasms , SARS-CoV-2/physiology , Virus Shedding/physiology , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/therapy , COVID-19/virology , COVID-19 Testing/methods , Evidence-Based Medicine/standards , Evidence-Based Medicine/statistics & numerical data , Germany/epidemiology , Hematologic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Hematologic Neoplasms/epidemiology , Hematologic Neoplasms/therapy , Hematologic Neoplasms/virology , Hematology/organization & administration , Hematology/standards , Humans , Immunization, Passive/methods , Immunization, Passive/standards , Infectious Disease Medicine/organization & administration , Infectious Disease Medicine/standards , Medical Oncology/organization & administration , Medical Oncology/standards , Neoplasms/diagnosis , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Neoplasms/therapy , Neoplasms/virology , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Societies, Medical/standards , Vaccination/methods , Vaccination/standards , COVID-19 Serotherapy
6.
J Infect Dis ; 222(Suppl 6): S535-S542, 2020 09 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32926742

ABSTRACT

Infectious diseases as a specialty is tilted toward social justice, and practitioners are frequently on the front lines of the battle against health inequity in practices that are diverse and sometimes cross international borders. Whether caring for patients living with the human immunodeficiency virus, tuberculosis, or Ebola, infectious diseases practitioners often interact with those at the margins of societies (eg, racial/ethnic/sexual/gender minorities), who disproportionately bear the brunt of these conditions. Therefore, cultural barriers between providers and patients are often salient in the infectious diseases context. In this article, we discuss cultural competence broadly, to include not only the knowledge and the skills needed at both the organizational and the individual levels to provide culturally appropriate care, but also to include "cultural humility"-a lifelong process of learning, self-reflection, and self-critique. To enhance the quality and the impact of our practices, we must prioritize cultural competence and humility and be mindful of the role of culture in the patient-provider-system interactions, in our larger healthcare systems, and in our research agendas and workforce development.


Subject(s)
Biomedical Research/standards , Cultural Competency , Delivery of Health Care/standards , Infectious Disease Medicine/standards , Attitude of Health Personnel , Biomedical Research/trends , Cultural Diversity , Delivery of Health Care/trends , Humans , Infectious Disease Medicine/trends , Social Justice
7.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 83(6): 1704-1716, 2020 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32891785

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To provide guidance about management of psoriatic disease during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. STUDY DESIGN: A task force (TF) of 18 physician voting members with expertise in dermatology, rheumatology, epidemiology, infectious diseases, and critical care was convened. The TF was supplemented by nonvoting members, which included fellows and National Psoriasis Foundation (NPF) staff. Clinical questions relevant to the psoriatic disease community were informed by questions received by the NPF. A Delphi process was conducted. RESULTS: The TF approved 22 guidance statements. The average of the votes was within the category of agreement for all statements. All guidance statements proposed were recommended, 9 with high consensus and 13 with moderate consensus. LIMITATIONS: The evidence behind many guidance statements is limited in quality. CONCLUSION: These statements provide guidance for the management of patients with psoriatic disease on topics ranging from how the disease and its treatments impact COVID-19 risk and outcome, how medical care can be optimized during the pandemic, what patients should do to lower their risk of getting infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 and what they should do if they develop COVID-19. The guidance is intended to be a living document that will be updated by the TF as data emerge.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Immunosuppressive Agents/adverse effects , Organizations, Nonprofit/standards , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Psoriasis/drug therapy , Advisory Committees/standards , Betacoronavirus/immunology , Betacoronavirus/pathogenicity , COVID-19 , Consensus , Coronavirus Infections/immunology , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Coronavirus Infections/virology , Critical Care/standards , Delphi Technique , Dermatology/standards , Epidemiology/standards , Humans , Infectious Disease Medicine/standards , Organizations, Nonprofit/organization & administration , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/immunology , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/virology , Psoriasis/complications , Psoriasis/immunology , Rheumatology/standards , SARS-CoV-2 , United States/epidemiology
8.
Palliat Med ; 34(9): 1220-1227, 2020 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32736486

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hospital palliative care is an essential part of the COVID-19 response, but relevant data are lacking. The recent literature underscores the need to implement protocols for symptom control and the training of non-specialists by palliative care teams. AIM: The aim of the study was to describe a palliative care unit's consultation and assistance intervention at the request of an Infectious Diseases Unit during the COVID-19 pandemic, determining what changes needed to be made in delivering palliative care. DESIGN: This is a single holistic case study design using data triangulation, for example, audio recordings of team meetings and field notes. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: This study was conducted in the Palliative Care Unit of the AUSL-IRCCS hospital of Reggio Emilia, which has no designated beds, consulting with the Infectious Diseases Unit of the same hospital. RESULTS: A total of 9 physicians and 22 nurses of the Infectious Diseases Unit and two physicians of the Palliative Care Unit participated in the study.Our Palliative Care Unit developed a feasible 18-day multicomponent consultation intervention. Three macro themes were identified: (1) new answers to new needs, (2) symptom relief and decision-making process, and (3) educational and training issues. CONCLUSION: From the perspective of palliative care, some changes in usual care needed to be made. These included breaking bad news, patients' use of communication devices, the limited time available for the delivery of care, managing death necessarily only inside the hospital, and relationships with families.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/therapy , Health Personnel/education , Hospice and Palliative Care Nursing/education , Hospice and Palliative Care Nursing/standards , Infectious Disease Medicine/education , Infectious Disease Medicine/standards , Pneumonia, Viral/therapy , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Adult , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Female , Hospice and Palliative Care Nursing/methods , Hospice and Palliative Care Nursing/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Infectious Disease Medicine/methods , Infectious Disease Medicine/statistics & numerical data , Italy/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Qualitative Research , SARS-CoV-2
9.
J Mycol Med ; 30(3): 101007, 2020 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32718789

ABSTRACT

Mucormycosis are life-threatening fungal infections especially affecting immunocompromised or diabetic patients. Despite treatment, mortality remains high (from 32 to 70% according to organ involvement). This review provides an update on mucormycosis management. The latest recommendations strongly recommend as first-line therapy the use of liposomal amphotericin B (≥5mg/kg) combined with surgery whenever possible. Isavuconazole and intravenous or delayed-release tablet forms of posaconazole have remained second-line. Many molecules are currently in development to fight against invasive fungal diseases but few have demonstrated efficacy against Mucorales. Despite in vitro efficacy, combinations of treatment have failed to demonstrate superiority versus monotherapy. Adjuvant therapies are particularly complex to evaluate without prospective randomized controlled studies, which are complex to perform due to low incidence rate and high mortality of mucormycosis. Perspectives are nonetheless encouraging. New approaches assessing relationships between host, fungi, and antifungal drugs, and new routes of administration such as aerosols could improve mucormycosis treatment.


Subject(s)
Infectious Disease Medicine/standards , Infectious Disease Medicine/trends , Mucormycosis/therapy , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Amphotericin B/therapeutic use , Antifungal Agents/therapeutic use , Combined Modality Therapy/methods , Combined Modality Therapy/standards , Combined Modality Therapy/trends , Diabetes Complications/microbiology , Humans , Immunocompromised Host , Infectious Disease Medicine/methods , Surgical Procedures, Operative/methods , Surgical Procedures, Operative/standards , Surgical Procedures, Operative/trends , Therapies, Investigational/methods , Therapies, Investigational/trends
10.
J Immunother Cancer ; 8(1)2020 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32554619

ABSTRACT

Immune-related (IR)-pneumonitis is a rare and potentially fatal toxicity of anti-PD(L)1 immunotherapy. Expert guidelines for the diagnosis and management of IR-pneumonitis include multidisciplinary input from medical oncology, pulmonary medicine, infectious disease, and radiology specialists. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 is a recently recognized respiratory virus that is responsible for causing the COVID-19 global pandemic. Symptoms and imaging findings from IR-pneumonitis and COVID-19 pneumonia can be similar, and early COVID-19 viral testing may yield false negative results, complicating the diagnosis and management of both entities. Herein, we present a set of multidisciplinary consensus recommendations for the diagnosis and management of IR-pneumonitis in the setting of COVID-19 including: (1) isolation procedures, (2) recommended imaging and interpretation, (3) adaptations to invasive testing, (4) adaptations to the management of IR-pneumonitis, (5) immunosuppression for steroid-refractory IR-pneumonitis, and (6) management of suspected concurrent IR-pneumonitis and COVID-19 infection. There is an emerging need for the adaptation of expert guidelines for IR-pneumonitis in the setting of the global COVID-19 pandemic. We propose a multidisciplinary consensus on this topic, in this position paper.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/adverse effects , Betacoronavirus/immunology , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Pneumonia/therapy , Practice Guidelines as Topic , B7-H1 Antigen/antagonists & inhibitors , B7-H1 Antigen/immunology , COVID-19 , Consensus , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/transmission , Coronavirus Infections/virology , Humans , Infectious Disease Medicine/standards , Interdisciplinary Communication , Lung/diagnostic imaging , Lung/drug effects , Lung/immunology , Medical Oncology/standards , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Neoplasms/immunology , Pneumonia/chemically induced , Pneumonia/diagnosis , Pneumonia/immunology , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/transmission , Pneumonia, Viral/virology , Pulmonary Medicine/standards , Radiology/standards , SARS-CoV-2 , United States/epidemiology
12.
J Clin Pathol ; 73(12): 836-839, 2020 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32576629

ABSTRACT

AIM: To assess the utility of a London-based infectious and tropical disease histopathology diagnostic review service. METHODS: The original and specialist review histopathology reports of 457 samples from over 3 years of referrals were compared retrospectively. RESULTS: Overall 329 (72.0%) showed no significant difference; 34 (7.4%) showed a non-clinically significant difference; and 94 (20.6%) showed a clinically significant difference. Of the 94 clinically significant discrepancies, 46 (48.9%) were incorrectly suspected infections; 19 (20.2%) were missed infections; 8 (8.5%) were different infections; and in 20 (21.3%), the specialist review yielded more specific identification of an organism or a more correct assessment of its viability. CONCLUSIONS: A review of histopathology cases by an infectious disease (ID) histopathology referral centre has yielded a 20.6% clinically significant error rate. Measures to improve training in ID histopathology in the UK are discussed.


Subject(s)
Communicable Diseases/diagnosis , Cytodiagnosis/standards , Diagnostic Errors , Infectious Disease Medicine/standards , Quality Assurance, Health Care , Cytodiagnosis/methods , Humans , London , Referral and Consultation , Retrospective Studies
13.
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin (Engl Ed) ; 38 Suppl 1: 45-52, 2020 Jan.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32111365

ABSTRACT

This article provides an analysis of the results obtained in 2017 by the participants inscribed in the External Quality Control Programme of the Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (SEIMC), which includes controls for bacteriology, serology, mycology, parasitology, mycobacteria, virology, molecular microbiology, and genotypic bacterial resistance. The results obtained in 2017 confirm the excellent skill and good technical standards found in previous editions. However, the programme again showed that erroneous results can be obtained in any laboratory and even in clinically relevant determinations. Once again, the results of this program highlight the need to implement both internal and external controls, as in the SEIMC programme.


Subject(s)
Infectious Disease Medicine/standards , Laboratories/standards , Microbiology/standards , Quality Control , Bacteriology , Humans , Mycology , Spain
14.
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin (Engl Ed) ; 38 Suppl 1: 53-60, 2020 Jan.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32111366

ABSTRACT

This article provides an analysis of the results obtained in 2018 by the participants inscribed in the External Quality Control Programme of the Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (SEIMC), which includes controls for bacteriology, serology, mycology, parasitology, mycobacteria, virology, molecular microbiology, and genotypic bacterial resistance. The results obtained in 2018 confirm the excellent skill and good technical standards found in the vast majority of Spanish clinical microbiology laboratories, as shown in previous editions. However, the programme again shows that erroneous results can be obtained in any laboratory and even in clinically relevant determinations. Once again, the results of this programme highlight the need to implement both internal and external controls, as in the SEIMC programme.


Subject(s)
Infectious Disease Medicine/standards , Laboratories/standards , Microbiology/standards , Quality Control , Bacteriology , Humans , Mycology , Spain
15.
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin (Engl Ed) ; 38 Suppl 1: 61-66, 2020 Jan.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32111367

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) and hepatitis B (HBV) and C virus (HCV) viral load determinations are among the most relevant markers for the follow-up of patients infected with these viruses. External quality control tools are crucial to ensure the accuracy of the results obtained by microbiology laboratories. This article summarised the results obtained from the 2017 SEIMC External Quality Control Programme for HIV-1, HCV, and HBV viral loads and HCV genotyping. METHODS AND RESULTS: In the HIV-1 programme, a total of five standards were sent. One standard consisted of seronegative human plasma, while the remaining four contained plasma from three different viremic patients, in the range of 2-5 log10 copies/mL; two of these standards were identical, with the aim of determining repeatability. A significant proportion of the laboratories (35% on average) obtained values outside the accepted range (mean±0.25 log10 copies/mL), depending on the standard and on the method used for quantification. Repeatability was good, with up to 94% of laboratories reporting results within the limits (D<0.5 log10 copies/mL). The HBV and HCV programme consisted of two standards with different viral load contents. Most of the participants, 82% in the case of HCV and 87% in that of HBV, obtained all the results within the accepted range (mean±1.96 SD log10 UI/mL). CONCLUSIONS: Data from this analysis reinforce the utility of proficiency programmes to ensure the quality of the results obtained by a particular laboratory. Due to the marked interlaboratory variability observed, it is advisable to use the same method and laboratory for patient follow-up.


Subject(s)
HIV Infections , Hepatitis B , Hepatitis C , Quality Control , Viral Load , HIV Infections/diagnosis , HIV-1 , Hepacivirus , Hepatitis B/diagnosis , Hepatitis B virus , Hepatitis C/diagnosis , Humans , Infectious Disease Medicine/standards
16.
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin (Engl Ed) ; 38 Suppl 1: 67-72, 2020 Jan.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32111368

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) and hepatitis B (HBV) and C virus (HCV) viral load determinations are among the most relevant markers for the follow-up of patients infected with these viruses. External quality control tools are crucial to ensure the accuracy of the results obtained by microbiology laboratories. This article summarised the results obtained from the 2018 SEIMC External Quality Control Programme for HIV-1, HCV, and HBV viral loads and HCV genotyping. METHODS AND RESULTS: In the HIV-1 program, a total of five standards were sent. One standard consisted of seronegative human plasma, while the remaining four contained plasma from three different viremic patients, in the range of 2-5 log10 copies/mL; two of these standards were identical, with the aim of determining repeatability. A significant proportion of the laboratories (28% on average) obtained values outside the accepted range (mean±0.25 log10 copies/mL), depending on the standard and on the method used for quantification. Repeatability was good, with most laboratories reporting results within the limits (D<0.5 log10 copies/mL). The HBV and HCV programme consisted of two standards with different viral load contents. Most of the participants, 87% in the case of HCV and 88% in the HBV, obtained all the results within the accepted range (mean±1.96 SD log10 UI/mL). CONCLUSIONS: Data from this analysis reinforce the utility of proficiency programmes to ensure the quality of the results obtained by a particular laboratory. Due to the marked interlaboratory variability, it is advisable to use the same method and the same laboratory for patient follow-up.


Subject(s)
HIV Infections , Hepatitis B , Hepatitis C , Quality Control , Viral Load , HIV Infections/diagnosis , HIV-1 , Hepacivirus , Hepatitis B/diagnosis , Hepatitis B virus , Hepatitis C/diagnosis , Humans , Infectious Disease Medicine/standards
17.
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd ; 1642020 02 11.
Article in Dutch | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32073803

ABSTRACT

In 2012 the multidisciplinary guideline Q fever fatigue syndrome was developed for the Netherlands. The availability of new research data and developments and experiences from daily clinical practice made it necessary to revise this guideline. The multidisciplinary working group that has revised the guideline is composed of representatives from all medical professions involved in the care of patients with QFS and representatives of the patients' association. The revised guideline incorporates a number of changes, including refinement of the QFS diagnostic criteria and updates regarding advice on support and reintegration.


Subject(s)
Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic/diagnosis , Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic/therapy , Infectious Disease Medicine/standards , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Q Fever/diagnosis , Q Fever/therapy , Humans , Interdisciplinary Communication , Netherlands , Patient Participation
19.
Med Mal Infect ; 49(6): 456-462, 2019 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31351803

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare the practices of French infection specialists related to antibiotic therapy duration between 2016 and 2018. METHODS: We conducted two identical surveys (in 2016 and 2018) targeting hospital-based infection specialists (medical physicians, pharmacists) who gave at least weekly advice on antibiotic prescriptions. The questionnaire included 15 clinical vignettes. Part A asked about the durations of antibiotic therapies they would usually advise to prescribers, and part B asked about the shortest duration they would be willing to advise for the same clinical situations. RESULTS: We included 325 specialists (165 in 2016 and 160 in 2018), mostly infectious disease specialists (82.4%, 268/325), members of antibiotic stewardship teams in 72% (234/325) of cases. Shorter antibiotic treatments (as compared with the literature) were advised to prescribers in more than half of the vignettes by 71% (105/147) of respondents in 2018, versus 46% (69/150) in 2016 (P<0.001). Guidelines used by participants displayed fixed durations for 77% (123/160) of cases in 2018 versus 21% (35/165) in 2016. Almost all respondents (89%, 131/160) declared they were aware of the 2017 SPILF's proposal. CONCLUSION: The release of guidelines promoting shorter durations of antibiotic therapy seems to have had a favourable impact on practices of specialists giving advice on antibiotic prescriptions.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Antimicrobial Stewardship/standards , Guideline Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Infectious Disease Medicine/standards , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Societies, Medical/standards , Adult , Antimicrobial Stewardship/methods , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , France/epidemiology , Humans , Infections/drug therapy , Infections/epidemiology , Infectious Disease Medicine/organization & administration , Male , Middle Aged , Online Systems , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/standards , Societies, Medical/organization & administration , Surveys and Questionnaires
20.
PLoS One ; 14(3): e0213627, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30870489

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Influenza-like Illness (ILI) is a medical diagnosis of possible influenza or another respiratory illness with a common set of symptoms. The deaths of four schoolchildren, during a pandemic influenza outbreak in December 2017 in Ghana, raised doubts about the ILI surveillance system's performance. We evaluated the ILI surveillance system in the Greater Accra region, Ghana, to assess the system's attributes and its performance on set objectives. METHODS: CDC guidelines were used to evaluate the data of the ILI surveillance system between 2013 and 2017. We interviewed the surveillance personnel on the system's description and operation. Additionally, routinely entered ILI data from the National Influenza Center provided by the six sentinel sites in Accra was extracted. We sampled and reviewed 120 ILI case-investigation forms from these sites. Surveillance activities were examined on system's performance indicators, each being scored on a scale of 1 to 3 (poorest to best performance). RESULTS: All population and age groups were under ILI surveillance over the period evaluated. Overall, 2948 suspected case-patients, including 392 (13.3%) children under-five were reported, with 219 being positive for influenza virus (Predictive value positive = 7.4%). The predominant influenza subtype was H3N2, recorded in 90 (41.1%) of positive case-patients. The system only met two out of its four objectives. None of the six sentinel sites consistently met their annual 260 suspected case-detection quota. Samples reached the laboratory on average 48 hours after collection and results were disseminated within 7 days. Of 120 case-investigation forms sampled, 91 (76.3%) were completely filled in. CONCLUSIONS: The ILI surveillance system in the Greater Accra region is only partially meeting its objectives. While it is found to be sensitive, representative and timely, the data quality was sub-optimal. We recommend the determination of thresholds for alert and outbreak detection and ensuring that sentinel sites meet their weekly case-detection targets.


Subject(s)
Influenza, Human/diagnosis , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Public Health Administration , Sentinel Surveillance , Algorithms , Communicable Disease Control , Cross-Sectional Studies , Data Accuracy , Databases, Factual , Disease Outbreaks , Geography , Ghana/epidemiology , Guidelines as Topic , Humans , Infectious Disease Medicine/methods , Infectious Disease Medicine/standards , Outpatients , Pandemics , Predictive Value of Tests , Program Development , Program Evaluation , World Health Organization
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...